tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post3467765957221933504..comments2024-03-18T13:17:27.834+08:00Comments on Kwong Fei's Blog: Aminulrasyid AmzahKwOnG FeIhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13798593258896811519noreply@blogger.comBlogger17125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-82944055829691969292013-12-12T16:49:38.574+08:002013-12-12T16:49:38.574+08:00My comment is simple. The boy is at fault. Sneakin...My comment is simple. The boy is at fault. Sneaking out late, stealing his fathers car. He us under 18 and going to mamak stall late at night to watch football match. This boy is shit. He should be home asleep. He can do the mamak stall thing when he is in his university years. The cops are right. People who drive dangerously should be shot. My brother in law bang a car and ran away, and should be shot. A person who bangs someones car and ran away is not a responsible person and should be shot. Someone driving without a license should be shot. I agree with the police motto nowadays, shoot first ask questions later. I am also glad to die in the hands of the police if I turn bad. The police of malaysia should also capture those politians who are corrupted stealing the rakyats money and shot them in the head too. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-57210384692891844572010-06-03T18:35:43.926+08:002010-06-03T18:35:43.926+08:00if this fellow without license drove out and kill ...if this fellow without license drove out and kill your relatives, then you will say otherwise. Stop being selfish, look at the situation in totality. The fellow driving so fast could have knock on any pedestrian and danger others road user especially motorcyclist.<br /><br />If some fellow dress in a mess with a parang approached you and your family and tell u he got no intention to hurt anyone. I think you will shoot him if you have a gun if he tries to approach nearer to you or your family.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-15649460652238691732010-05-23T14:52:10.821+08:002010-05-23T14:52:10.821+08:00yes the deceased is wrong for:
1. sneaking out fro...yes the deceased is wrong for:<br />1. sneaking out from his house without permission<br />2. driving without license<br />3. not stopping the vehicle when ordered by the police.<br /><br />My question is under which penal code does it allow the police to kill the poor boy. Mind everyone, he is only 14! I would imagine that the only thing he wanted to do that night was to get his family to talk and settle with police...whatever happen and least he or anyone who is not a criminal would expect was to be gunned down by the police. I think he was dead even before he could turn into the lane leading to his house and hit the palm tree not far after the junction to his house. Use the law to sue the family for whatever offence the boy did but please also make sure the policeman is sentenced to death for murder. As I mentioned, which penal code allowed him to kill the boy!!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-74232104488187590042010-05-14T02:49:07.749+08:002010-05-14T02:49:07.749+08:00@anomynous: may his soul rest in peace..if the pol...@anomynous: may his soul rest in peace..if the police is found guilty, he will receive the consequences.. let's wait what will happen through the court proceedings<br /><br />@Mr_abs: i do agree with your view. If the police patrol car wasn't there, the hit and run of 2 count of accidents will be just left in such a way. I wonder how serious is the motorcyclist involved in 2nd accident. A fall from motorcycle can really hurt.<br /><br />Parents indirectly are part of the problem which was not highlighted in the media. I think the whole malaysianhad overlooked the case. Those who mentioned such thing might be considered as intolerate? not sense of pity? bla bla bla<br /><br />@ziza: erm salute in terms of which action???<br /><br />the police did their job in maintaining the public peace and safety.<br /><br />the police did correctly to chase a car which did not stop despite being warned.<br /><br />the police may be correct to use gun after long trial of sopping the car.<br /><br />but the police may not so correct to release so many shots and aiming at the driver.KwOnG FeIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13798593258896811519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-13124476765427878252010-05-13T21:10:15.634+08:002010-05-13T21:10:15.634+08:00I salute the police action.I salute the police action.zizanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-50051827932956521152010-05-13T15:35:02.186+08:002010-05-13T15:35:02.186+08:00bro. very informative indeed. i posted this case, ...bro. very informative indeed. i posted this case, in my blog. and after doing some research, there is another key elements left out during the press conference by azamuddin.<br /><br />there were 3 police patrol cars chasing the car, driven by aminulrasyid. <br /><br />people tend to look this matter solely from one view. don't the public think that after all, the very basic issue, teenagers, 15 years old are not allowed to drive. do not blame solely on the police, they are merely doing their jobs. they follow SOP. unfortunately, the one they were chasing which fitted the 'criminal suspects', were actually 15 years old boys. <br /><br />the police only did their job, then this unfortunate event happen. <br /><br /><br />the parents told the media, their son, was an obedient son, a good son. does that justify, that their son could drive a car then? NO. anak yang berbudi bahasa, etc. it's nothing to do with rules and laws. admit it uncle and aunty, it started way back at home. if they didnt give permission for the late aminulrasyid to drive, then this won't happen.<br /><br /><br />what if there was no police car at that time? we will never know, 15 year old kids, nowadays are actually driving their parents car to go to mamak! yes, my view is, the kids' parents have portion of faults in this case.<br /><br />police are the authorized people in this country, which uphold rules and laws. they are only doing their job. do not blame them if they do their jobs by following SOP. <br /><br />for parents out there, please do not let your children to drive your cars!mr_abshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03066599737569741799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-79756143254523268782010-05-13T10:22:40.662+08:002010-05-13T10:22:40.662+08:00good job dude! i like ur article..he's a very ...good job dude! i like ur article..he's a very good n an active boy in school..minul is my schoolmate, everyone miss him.. :(Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-61629691813559337872010-05-09T03:27:23.755+08:002010-05-09T03:27:23.755+08:00@kenwooi: dats another concern which is not addres...@kenwooi: dats another concern which is not addressed in public. The issues are <br /><br />1. driving without license and whether the parents are aware of it<br /><br />2. watching football late night (occasionally will be ok but what if everyday especially for coming worldcup?)<br /><br />however, it is utmost difficult to prevent any growing kids to go outside and perhaps a family curfew time shall be imposed.<br /><br />@SonnyKazu: agreed. it have never been mentioned that the parents are aware of the kid driving his sister car. Not even to our knowledge whether the sister knew it. All these need to be taken into consideration.<br /> <br />@kudos: partially agree.. well, accident happened anytime and anywhere. At the same time, we cant stuck inside our house 24 h without going out. But when we are allowed to go out, till which extent can it be? That's the dilemma of parent.<br /><br />if the young boy are only allowed to go out and return before 12 am, dat also doesnt mean at that particular time, it is safer than going out after 12 am.<br /><br />towards the end, is all about dilemma. Of course, the parents would like to see their kids sitting and studying at home 24 H per day.<br /><br />@thomas: and the newest incident is a policemen shoot to the hip of a young mat rempit as they called. Luckily, thank GOD he survived from that incident. However, the good side of this event is that the POLICE had APOLOGISED and make public statement that it was their men fault. As contrast to Aminul case, it was sad to link him with robberies and God knows why a parang was claimed to be found in the car. <br /><br />@Anonymous: well, anyone is free to make their comment and there is no right or wrong. However, let the comment be justified. Thanks for compliment.KwOnG FeIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13798593258896811519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-63062467408312125202010-05-08T17:07:10.668+08:002010-05-08T17:07:10.668+08:00i think gerry made a very foolish comment. proves ...i think gerry made a very foolish comment. proves that he has no brains whatsoever.<br /><br />kwongfei, your stand is very strong. admire u on this.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-61575224293399391262010-05-08T07:20:05.671+08:002010-05-08T07:20:05.671+08:00Policeman shouldn't be trigger happy,shot to s...Policeman shouldn't be trigger happy,shot to stop the car not kill the driver,arrest without killing.There have been too many incident with other races now it happen to a young malay boy and yet the police are so arrogant.<br />Come on you are paid to protect us not kill us!Thomas Lee/Lee Lip Panghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06855358816772529182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-82109101069327147812010-05-08T00:33:34.767+08:002010-05-08T00:33:34.767+08:00@kenwooi
your argument is invalid.
that is the sa...@kenwooi<br /><br />your argument is invalid.<br />that is the same as saying,<br /><br />"if the car was not invented, then the shit won't happen."<br /><br />"if the police did not patrolled, then the shit won't happen."<br /><br />the "what if" talk is irrelevant.kudosnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-76024372693910024012010-05-08T00:32:04.075+08:002010-05-08T00:32:04.075+08:00oh dear, what a huge story it is!
If he wants to ...oh dear, what a huge story it is!<br /><br />If he wants to watch football, he should better let the elders drive them there safely. Why he can drive the car without a valid license? We didn't even know whether he drove the car without his parents' knowledge or they allowed him to do so, trusted him that he will be driving home safely. But in the end, incident happens.<br /><br />Rest In Peace, adik Aminulrasyid.<br /><br />My condolences to the boy's family.SonnyKazuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02655048385846608988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-35962600889494884822010-05-07T23:54:20.707+08:002010-05-07T23:54:20.707+08:00in my perspective, if the boy didn't drive ill...in my perspective, if the boy didn't drive illegally at such hours, he could have avoided all these FIRST..Ken Wooihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09777306693372682810noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-18911379995972785342010-05-07T22:37:39.666+08:002010-05-07T22:37:39.666+08:00@Dinah: thanks~
@pompuancun: hmm no comment on da...@Dinah: thanks~<br /><br />@pompuancun: hmm no comment on dat..<br /><br />@kudos: agreed<br /><br />@gerry: DISAGREE..<br /><br />first of all, it depends on the distance. Police dun shoot if the distance is near bro! If you at a point to shoot, it mean that you have the sufficient distance to aim and shoot. if the distance is too near, of course you have no choice. I had never mentioned police can't shoot to death at that point of close distance. That's what we called as danger zone. If the police have sufficient distance, they should have aim at parts other than vital organs. <br /><br />second, all the Unit tindakan khas or STU team are trained to AIM accurately. You can check this out. <br /><br />third, depend on situation. if you are alone and you can able to avoid dat parang if the suspect swing to you, then why not shoot at the lower limb? if you are alone and you cant do so, it's no choice to shoot at the body. In fact, as i had mentioned, shooting is allowed when your suspects is carrying a heavy weapon in front of you. if you are with a team of 2 or more, one will act as distractor while another one aim at shooting. While if and only if the suspect swing at you, immediately your collegues should had fired at him alrdy.KwOnG FeIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13798593258896811519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-48601670335444581062010-05-07T20:54:48.899+08:002010-05-07T20:54:48.899+08:00>>>At any time when comes to shooting, th...>>>At any time when comes to shooting, the police should always try not to cause death to any of suspects. The police should be trained to target their firearms towards upper or lower limbs instead of head or the upper abdomen where most of the vital organs are located. <br /><br />are you kidding me??? you think it's easy kah, at the point in which your life is in danger, u nak hati-hati dan sebegitu cermat sekali aim one small part of the human body holding and flinging parang panjang to cut your head off????gerrynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-23757253281722227142010-05-07T18:08:35.034+08:002010-05-07T18:08:35.034+08:00of cos they did not ram the car. cos if they did, ...of cos they did not ram the car. cos if they did, the car would not be in the drain. even the stupidest ppl could have guess that.kudosnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8341107200883178928.post-75179079117884791482010-05-07T15:44:21.926+08:002010-05-07T15:44:21.926+08:00alamak. ruginye. budak ni kalo dah besar mesti hen...alamak. ruginye. budak ni kalo dah besar mesti hensem kan.pompuancunnoreply@blogger.com